<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19347</link>
    <description>Section 281 of the Income-tax Act is declaratory and does not confer independent adjudicatory power on income-tax authorities to declare a transfer void. In the absence of any prescribed statutory procedure, enforcement of the Revenue&#039;s claim had to be pursued through properly constituted civil proceedings, not by an internal tax order. The court also held that an order made against a deceased assessee could not survive. Because the section 281 declaration was unsustainable, the consequential attachment notice under section 226(3) also failed: that provision applies only where money is due or may become due to the assessee or is held on the assessee&#039;s account, which could not be established on the invalid premise relied on by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19347</link>
      <description>Section 281 of the Income-tax Act is declaratory and does not confer independent adjudicatory power on income-tax authorities to declare a transfer void. In the absence of any prescribed statutory procedure, enforcement of the Revenue&#039;s claim had to be pursued through properly constituted civil proceedings, not by an internal tax order. The court also held that an order made against a deceased assessee could not survive. Because the section 281 declaration was unsustainable, the consequential attachment notice under section 226(3) also failed: that provision applies only where money is due or may become due to the assessee or is held on the assessee&#039;s account, which could not be established on the invalid premise relied on by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>