<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 593 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384404</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging an order dated 05.07.2019, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act. The court instructed the respondents not to encash the bank guarantee for 90 days to allow the petitioner to obtain necessary orders through the appellate authority. If a stay petition was filed, it was to be addressed within the stipulated three-month period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 593 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384404</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging an order dated 05.07.2019, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act. The court instructed the respondents not to encash the bank guarantee for 90 days to allow the petitioner to obtain necessary orders through the appellate authority. If a stay petition was filed, it was to be addressed within the stipulated three-month period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>