<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 584 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384395</link>
    <description>Where an appellate tribunal set aside an assessment for breach of natural justice but expressly provided that the original assessment would stand restored if the assessee failed to produce records, the restoration operated automatically on default. The assessee did not produce the records, so the earlier assessment revived and bound both parties for that assessment year. The assessing officer could not ignore the tribunal&#039;s binding direction and initiate a fresh reassessment on the same basis after limitation had expired. The reassessment was therefore held without jurisdiction and illegal, and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 584 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384395</link>
      <description>Where an appellate tribunal set aside an assessment for breach of natural justice but expressly provided that the original assessment would stand restored if the assessee failed to produce records, the restoration operated automatically on default. The assessee did not produce the records, so the earlier assessment revived and bound both parties for that assessment year. The assessing officer could not ignore the tribunal&#039;s binding direction and initiate a fresh reassessment on the same basis after limitation had expired. The reassessment was therefore held without jurisdiction and illegal, and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>