https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282564 An application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 is decided on a demurrer, so the Court must confine itself to the plaint and the documents relied upon or referred to by the plaintiff. Defence material or the defendant's written statement cannot be examined. The distinction between no cause of action and an inadequately pleaded cause of action is material, and allegations of misrepresentation, concealment, fraud and coercion may disclose triable issues requiring evidence. Partial rejection of a plaint is not permissible under Order 7 Rule 11. On these principles, the plaint could not be rejected at the threshold and the revision challenging refusal to reject it failed. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:22:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282564 An application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 is decided on a demurrer, so the Court must confine itself to the plaint and the documents relied upon or referred to by the plaintiff. Defence material or the defendant's written statement cannot be examined. The distinction between no cause of action and an inadequately pleaded cause of action is material, and allegations of misrepresentation, concealment, fraud and coercion may disclose triable issues requiring evidence. Partial rejection of a plaint is not permissible under Order 7 Rule 11. On these principles, the plaint could not be rejected at the threshold and the revision challenging refusal to reject it failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282564