<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 311 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282562</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the trial court&#039;s order and directing it to consider the petitioners&#039; application under Order 7, Rule 11 on its merits within eight weeks. The court emphasized that rejection of a plaint under Rule 11 can occur at any stage of the proceedings, even before the filing of a written statement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:54:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 311 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282562</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the trial court&#039;s order and directing it to consider the petitioners&#039; application under Order 7, Rule 11 on its merits within eight weeks. The court emphasized that rejection of a plaint under Rule 11 can occur at any stage of the proceedings, even before the filing of a written statement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>