https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282559 Where a sector is governed by a specialised regulatory framework, the regulator under that framework must first determine the jurisdictional facts and regulatory obligations before the competition authority can assess whether the conduct amounts to cartelisation or an anti-competitive agreement. In the telecom context, issues such as interconnection, quality of service, licence conditions, subscriber status and points of interconnection fall first for determination under the telecom regime; competition review at that stage is premature. An order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act is ordinarily administrative, but judicial review under Article 226 remains available where the challenge concerns the existence of jurisdictional facts and the authority's competence to initiate inquiry. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:11:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282559 Where a sector is governed by a specialised regulatory framework, the regulator under that framework must first determine the jurisdictional facts and regulatory obligations before the competition authority can assess whether the conduct amounts to cartelisation or an anti-competitive agreement. In the telecom context, issues such as interconnection, quality of service, licence conditions, subscriber status and points of interconnection fall first for determination under the telecom regime; competition review at that stage is premature. An order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act is ordinarily administrative, but judicial review under Article 226 remains available where the challenge concerns the existence of jurisdictional facts and the authority's competence to initiate inquiry. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282559