<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, following the precedent set by the Delhi High Court and considering the evolving legal landscape regarding the jurisdiction of DRI officers. The matters were remanded for a fresh decision after the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, maintaining the status quo until a final decision is reached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:10:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, following the precedent set by the Delhi High Court and considering the evolving legal landscape regarding the jurisdiction of DRI officers. The matters were remanded for a fresh decision after the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, maintaining the status quo until a final decision is reached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>