<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1838 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282546</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition challenging the final assessment order under the Income Tax Act, finding a violation of Section 144C as the order was passed without a mandatory draft assessment order. Citing previous judgments, the Court held that the mandatory requirements under Section 144C must be met. As a result, the final assessment order and subsequent penalty proceedings were set aside in favor of the Assessee. The Court did not address the issue of exceeding the limitation period due to the finding of the Section 144C violation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1838 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282546</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition challenging the final assessment order under the Income Tax Act, finding a violation of Section 144C as the order was passed without a mandatory draft assessment order. Citing previous judgments, the Court held that the mandatory requirements under Section 144C must be met. As a result, the final assessment order and subsequent penalty proceedings were set aside in favor of the Assessee. The Court did not address the issue of exceeding the limitation period due to the finding of the Section 144C violation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>