<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1552 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282533</link>
    <description>Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act was applied to information linked to an ongoing criminal prosecution because disclosure would impede prosecution and prejudice the process before final adjudication. The expression &quot;prosecution of offenders&quot; was read in context to cover the prosecution until the criminal case is finally decided, and material under the control of the trial court was treated as confidential prosecution material not disclosable through RTI where disclosure would interfere with the court&#039;s discretion. The refusal to disclose the requested information was upheld, apart from the RC numbers already directed to be supplied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:23:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1552 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282533</link>
      <description>Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act was applied to information linked to an ongoing criminal prosecution because disclosure would impede prosecution and prejudice the process before final adjudication. The expression &quot;prosecution of offenders&quot; was read in context to cover the prosecution until the criminal case is finally decided, and material under the control of the trial court was treated as confidential prosecution material not disclosable through RTI where disclosure would interfere with the court&#039;s discretion. The refusal to disclose the requested information was upheld, apart from the RC numbers already directed to be supplied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>