https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282532 The SC held the state admission scheme unconstitutional in part for provincial bias and inadequate out-of-state reservation, directing reconsideration for a more inclusive policy. It upheld awarding extra marks for relevant diplomas but ruled that possession of the diploma by the application deadline suffices even if documentary proof is filed before selection. The government's directive permitting late submission of certificates was validated. The SC reversed the HC's blanket annulment of admissions as disproportionate, allowed affected students to continue studies, and directed creation of additional seats to avoid academic loss. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282532 The SC held the state admission scheme unconstitutional in part for provincial bias and inadequate out-of-state reservation, directing reconsideration for a more inclusive policy. It upheld awarding extra marks for relevant diplomas but ruled that possession of the diploma by the application deadline suffices even if documentary proof is filed before selection. The government's directive permitting late submission of certificates was validated. The SC reversed the HC's blanket annulment of admissions as disproportionate, allowed affected students to continue studies, and directed creation of additional seats to avoid academic loss. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282532