https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282525 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter to the AO for a fresh decision after finding that the annual value of the second self-occupied property should be determined as if it were let out, but the Rent Control Act provisions were not adequately considered. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order issued on 29.2.2012. en-us Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282525 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter to the AO for a fresh decision after finding that the annual value of the second self-occupied property should be determined as if it were let out, but the Rent Control Act provisions were not adequately considered. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order issued on 29.2.2012. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282525