<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 63 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19336</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the inauguration of its new unit was a revenue expenditure allowable as business expenditure. As no question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, the original petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 63 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19336</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the inauguration of its new unit was a revenue expenditure allowable as business expenditure. As no question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, the original petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>