<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 576 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384387</link>
    <description>An arbitration agreement may be proved by written correspondence, recorded consent and pleadings showing consensus ad idem, even without a formal bilateral contract; on the facts, the parties&#039; consent before the High Court and participation before the arbitrator established a valid agreement, so the objection failed. A non-signatory may also be joined where the transaction is composite and the conduct of the parties shows a common intention to arbitrate together; CANFINA&#039;s role in the bonds transaction and its participation in the proceedings made it a proper party, so joinder was ordered in the pending arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2019 06:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 576 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384387</link>
      <description>An arbitration agreement may be proved by written correspondence, recorded consent and pleadings showing consensus ad idem, even without a formal bilateral contract; on the facts, the parties&#039; consent before the High Court and participation before the arbitrator established a valid agreement, so the objection failed. A non-signatory may also be joined where the transaction is composite and the conduct of the parties shows a common intention to arbitrate together; CANFINA&#039;s role in the bonds transaction and its participation in the proceedings made it a proper party, so joinder was ordered in the pending arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>