<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 45 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19334</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the ship repair expenditure as revenue expenditure. It ruled in favor of the Revenue on deducting loans under section 80J and in favor of the assessee on the applicability of section 40(c) to directors. The case was disposed of without any order on costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 45 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19334</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the ship repair expenditure as revenue expenditure. It ruled in favor of the Revenue on deducting loans under section 80J and in favor of the assessee on the applicability of section 40(c) to directors. The case was disposed of without any order on costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>