<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 556 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete various additions and disallowances, including under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, depreciation on life-saving equipment, interest expenses, and other specific additions based on documentary evidence. Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) were also deleted, considering the debatable nature of the issues and the assessee&#039;s disclosure of all relevant details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 556 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete various additions and disallowances, including under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, depreciation on life-saving equipment, interest expenses, and other specific additions based on documentary evidence. Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) were also deleted, considering the debatable nature of the issues and the assessee&#039;s disclosure of all relevant details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>