<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 555 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The AO&#039;s failure to independently verify information and the improper rejection of the assessee&#039;s evidence were key factors in the Tribunal&#039;s judgment. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of independent application of mind by the AO in reopening assessments and the requirement for proper inquiries to substantiate additions under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 555 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The AO&#039;s failure to independently verify information and the improper rejection of the assessee&#039;s evidence were key factors in the Tribunal&#039;s judgment. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of independent application of mind by the AO in reopening assessments and the requirement for proper inquiries to substantiate additions under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>