<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 526 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and granting the appellant the interest refund along with applicable interest. The decision emphasized the importance of proving unjust enrichment and the specific allocation of costs in determining refund eligibility under the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 526 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and granting the appellant the interest refund along with applicable interest. The decision emphasized the importance of proving unjust enrichment and the specific allocation of costs in determining refund eligibility under the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>