<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 524 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384335</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenged revision notices issued under the Gujarat VAT framework as lacking jurisdiction and sought quashing and interim restraint. During the proceedings, the tax authority informed the court that the impugned notice had been withdrawn after due process. In view of that withdrawal, the court recorded that nothing further required adjudication, disposed of the petition, discharged the rule, and vacated the interim stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 524 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384335</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenged revision notices issued under the Gujarat VAT framework as lacking jurisdiction and sought quashing and interim restraint. During the proceedings, the tax authority informed the court that the impugned notice had been withdrawn after due process. In view of that withdrawal, the court recorded that nothing further required adjudication, disposed of the petition, discharged the rule, and vacated the interim stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>