<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 523 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384334</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court held that a notification cancelling used F-forms could not be sustained where the challenge was already covered by an earlier court order in a similar matter and a corresponding view of another High Court had been noted. On that basis, the impugned notification was set aside. The Court, however, left it open to the respondents to take any other action in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 523 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384334</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court held that a notification cancelling used F-forms could not be sustained where the challenge was already covered by an earlier court order in a similar matter and a corresponding view of another High Court had been noted. On that basis, the impugned notification was set aside. The Court, however, left it open to the respondents to take any other action in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>