https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282511 A writ of habeas corpus may be used in a child-custody dispute where a minor has been unlawfully removed from the lawful custody of a parent, and a pending criminal prosecution against the other parent does not bar that relief. Article 20(3) does not excuse a party from producing the child or prevent the court from acting on unchallenged evidence. The text also states that impossibility of obedience is a defence to contempt only where genuinely established; a bare denial is insufficient. Alternative remedies do not prevent writ relief or contempt consequences where a court order is deliberately disobeyed. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:39:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282511 A writ of habeas corpus may be used in a child-custody dispute where a minor has been unlawfully removed from the lawful custody of a parent, and a pending criminal prosecution against the other parent does not bar that relief. Article 20(3) does not excuse a party from producing the child or prevent the court from acting on unchallenged evidence. The text also states that impossibility of obedience is a defence to contempt only where genuinely established; a bare denial is insufficient. Alternative remedies do not prevent writ relief or contempt consequences where a court order is deliberately disobeyed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282511