<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1795 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the addition of US $ 62,000 in business income, ruling the reopening of assessment lacked substantial evidence and independent inquiry, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal also upheld the appeal regarding interest charges under Sections 234A and 234B due to the consequential nature of the issue, pronouncing the order in favor of the assessee on March 9, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 07:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1795 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the addition of US $ 62,000 in business income, ruling the reopening of assessment lacked substantial evidence and independent inquiry, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal also upheld the appeal regarding interest charges under Sections 234A and 234B due to the consequential nature of the issue, pronouncing the order in favor of the assessee on March 9, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>