<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 507 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, confirming the treatment of deposits in Corporation Bank as unexplained investments under Section 69. The assessee was found to have been given sufficient opportunities to explain the deposits but failed to do so. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 507 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, confirming the treatment of deposits in Corporation Bank as unexplained investments under Section 69. The assessee was found to have been given sufficient opportunities to explain the deposits but failed to do so. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>