<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 502 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384313</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the addition of Rs. 26,75,724/- as long-term capital gains under Section 50C was upheld. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee&#039;s claim of the transaction being a gift under Section 56(2)(vi) due to the lack of a gift deed and proper documentation. The order of the CIT(A) was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 502 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384313</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the addition of Rs. 26,75,724/- as long-term capital gains under Section 50C was upheld. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee&#039;s claim of the transaction being a gift under Section 56(2)(vi) due to the lack of a gift deed and proper documentation. The order of the CIT(A) was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>