<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 499 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty order imposed under Section 271-E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to it being time-barred under Section 275(1)(c). The Tribunal held that the penalty order issued on 27.1.2017 was beyond the permissible period, with the initiation of penalty proceedings deemed to be on 24.3.2016. The penalty order was considered invalid as it exceeded the statutory time limit, leading to its cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 499 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty order imposed under Section 271-E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to it being time-barred under Section 275(1)(c). The Tribunal held that the penalty order issued on 27.1.2017 was beyond the permissible period, with the initiation of penalty proceedings deemed to be on 24.3.2016. The penalty order was considered invalid as it exceeded the statutory time limit, leading to its cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>