<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 497 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision to revoke the appellant&#039;s license, finding that the appellant was not involved in the consignment intercepted later and that the revocation based on a subsequent interception was unjustified. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the imported assorted birthday candles should be classified as candles, not fireworks, based on their essential use criteria. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proportionality in punishment and concluded that the license revocation and penalty imposed were disproportionate and unjustified. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the order on 07.08.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 497 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision to revoke the appellant&#039;s license, finding that the appellant was not involved in the consignment intercepted later and that the revocation based on a subsequent interception was unjustified. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the imported assorted birthday candles should be classified as candles, not fireworks, based on their essential use criteria. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proportionality in punishment and concluded that the license revocation and penalty imposed were disproportionate and unjustified. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the order on 07.08.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>