https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384307 The dissenting workmen were found not bound by consent terms between the union and creditors. They were entitled to wages until 29th September 2005, not 24th October 2008, as determined by the appellate court. The court upheld the entitlement of workmen under various items but dismissed challenges to notice pay and closure compensation. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order on wages but confirming other aspects, with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Nov 2019 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384307 The dissenting workmen were found not bound by consent terms between the union and creditors. They were entitled to wages until 29th September 2005, not 24th October 2008, as determined by the appellate court. The court upheld the entitlement of workmen under various items but dismissed challenges to notice pay and closure compensation. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order on wages but confirming other aspects, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384307