https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384302 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to discrepancies in quantification, erroneous findings, and lack of sustainability in law. The appellant's challenge against the demand for excess CENVAT credit was successful, emphasizing the significance of accurate quantification and factual correctness in such cases. en-us Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:43:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384302 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to discrepancies in quantification, erroneous findings, and lack of sustainability in law. The appellant's challenge against the demand for excess CENVAT credit was successful, emphasizing the significance of accurate quantification and factual correctness in such cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384302