<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 481 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384292</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation detailing the form of security they intend to furnish in place of the tax demand, instructing the authority to reconsider the matter, disregarding the previous order. The petitioner was given a two-week deadline to submit the representation, after which the authority would pass an appropriate order following the law. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 481 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384292</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation detailing the form of security they intend to furnish in place of the tax demand, instructing the authority to reconsider the matter, disregarding the previous order. The petitioner was given a two-week deadline to submit the representation, after which the authority would pass an appropriate order following the law. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>