https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384287 The court dismissed the petitioners' application for recall of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as it was found not maintainable under Section 204 of the Cr.P.C. The court relied on the precedent in Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal, emphasizing that the power to review the order of issuance of process was not within its jurisdiction. The petitioners' argument that essential elements for an offense under Section 138 were not met was not accepted, and they were advised to contest the proceedings before the trial court. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:41:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384287 The court dismissed the petitioners' application for recall of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as it was found not maintainable under Section 204 of the Cr.P.C. The court relied on the precedent in Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal, emphasizing that the power to review the order of issuance of process was not within its jurisdiction. The petitioners' argument that essential elements for an offense under Section 138 were not met was not accepted, and they were advised to contest the proceedings before the trial court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384287