<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1837 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282499</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the computation of capital gains on a transferred asset acquired through gift, holding that the indexed cost of acquisition should be based on the previous owner&#039;s indexed cost. The tribunal also sided with the assessee on the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of profit transferred due to client code changes, emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the allegation of profit shifting and highlighting that client code modifications did not necessarily indicate fraudulent activities. The tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) based on legal precedents, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1837 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282499</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the computation of capital gains on a transferred asset acquired through gift, holding that the indexed cost of acquisition should be based on the previous owner&#039;s indexed cost. The tribunal also sided with the assessee on the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of profit transferred due to client code changes, emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the allegation of profit shifting and highlighting that client code modifications did not necessarily indicate fraudulent activities. The tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) based on legal precedents, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>