<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1691 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282503</link>
    <description>Where an order is appealable under Section 35-B of the Central Excise Act and an efficacious statutory remedy exists before the Central Excise Appellate Tribunal, the High Court will ordinarily decline to exercise writ jurisdiction. The document notes that the impugned Commissioner&#039;s order was treated as appealable, so the writ petition was disposed of without examining the merits, with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1691 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282503</link>
      <description>Where an order is appealable under Section 35-B of the Central Excise Act and an efficacious statutory remedy exists before the Central Excise Appellate Tribunal, the High Court will ordinarily decline to exercise writ jurisdiction. The document notes that the impugned Commissioner&#039;s order was treated as appealable, so the writ petition was disposed of without examining the merits, with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>