<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282502</link>
    <description>The court declined to frame a question of law regarding the nature of payment of royalty and technical guidance fee, aligning with precedent. The case was adjourned to allow the Revenue to present arguments on the deletion of the addition under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, indicating a willingness to consider further submissions before making a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282502</link>
      <description>The court declined to frame a question of law regarding the nature of payment of royalty and technical guidance fee, aligning with precedent. The case was adjourned to allow the Revenue to present arguments on the deletion of the addition under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, indicating a willingness to consider further submissions before making a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>