<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1794 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the aggregation approach for benchmarking international transactions using the TNMM, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. It allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleting disallowances for warranty provisions and bad debts, and directed recomputation for disallowance under Section 40(a)(i). The Tribunal affirmed TNMM over CUP method for benchmarking, citing lack of basis for ad hoc adjustments and rejecting selective application of CUP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 13:56:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1794 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the aggregation approach for benchmarking international transactions using the TNMM, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal. It allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleting disallowances for warranty provisions and bad debts, and directed recomputation for disallowance under Section 40(a)(i). The Tribunal affirmed TNMM over CUP method for benchmarking, citing lack of basis for ad hoc adjustments and rejecting selective application of CUP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>