https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282482 A request to modify earlier directions was rejected because the apprehension of delay in Enforcement Directorate adjudication had been sufficiently addressed by later developments. The Court noted that the Supreme Court had already directed expeditious completion of the pending proceedings, notices had been issued, and the adjudication had commenced. In that context, and given the expectation under the foreign exchange regime that such proceedings conclude within a reasonable period, no modification of the earlier directions was warranted. The application was disposed of. en-us Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Aug 2019 13:18:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282482 A request to modify earlier directions was rejected because the apprehension of delay in Enforcement Directorate adjudication had been sufficiently addressed by later developments. The Court noted that the Supreme Court had already directed expeditious completion of the pending proceedings, notices had been issued, and the adjudication had commenced. In that context, and given the expectation under the foreign exchange regime that such proceedings conclude within a reasonable period, no modification of the earlier directions was warranted. The application was disposed of. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282482