<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 23 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19309</link>
    <description>The court held that income derived from a partial partition of a Hindu undivided family should be added to the assessee&#039;s income based on the retrospective amendment introduced by the Finance Act. Additionally, the court upheld the levy of interest under section 139(8) against the assessee for filing the return late, as exceptional circumstances to waive the interest were not proven. Both issues were decided in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:09:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 23 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19309</link>
      <description>The court held that income derived from a partial partition of a Hindu undivided family should be added to the assessee&#039;s income based on the retrospective amendment introduced by the Finance Act. Additionally, the court upheld the levy of interest under section 139(8) against the assessee for filing the return late, as exceptional circumstances to waive the interest were not proven. Both issues were decided in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>