<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 463 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384274</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the limitations on carrying forward unabsorbed depreciation beyond eight assessment years as per the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court relied on precedents such as General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. and Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Panchmahal Steel Ltd., affirming that unabsorbed depreciation can only be set off within the specified period. The appeal failed to introduce new arguments, leading to the affirmation of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 463 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384274</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the limitations on carrying forward unabsorbed depreciation beyond eight assessment years as per the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court relied on precedents such as General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. and Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Panchmahal Steel Ltd., affirming that unabsorbed depreciation can only be set off within the specified period. The appeal failed to introduce new arguments, leading to the affirmation of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>