<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 453 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384264</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the assessment of income as business income and canceling the penalty under section 271B. The decision was based on the genuine belief of the assessee regarding the nature of the transaction, the absence of evidence supporting business activities, and the reasonable cause for not auditing accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 453 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384264</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the assessment of income as business income and canceling the penalty under section 271B. The decision was based on the genuine belief of the assessee regarding the nature of the transaction, the absence of evidence supporting business activities, and the reasonable cause for not auditing accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>