<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 55 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19307</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to levy interest under section 139(8) in reassessment proceedings, finding it permissible to charge interest on the tax determined in the original assessment even in subsequent proceedings. The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s writ petition, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s discretion and ruling that no manifest injustice occurred by sustaining the interest levy under section 139(8) in the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 55 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19307</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to levy interest under section 139(8) in reassessment proceedings, finding it permissible to charge interest on the tax determined in the original assessment even in subsequent proceedings. The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s writ petition, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s discretion and ruling that no manifest injustice occurred by sustaining the interest levy under section 139(8) in the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>