<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 442 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384253</link>
    <description>The M.P. for AY 2014-15 was partly allowed, and the M.P. for AY 2015-16 was fully allowed, resulting in the recall of the tribunal order for further examination of specific grounds that were not initially decided. The judgment focused on the non-adjudication of certain grounds in the original and additional grounds of appeal for both assessment years, emphasizing the need for addressing all pressed grounds by the authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 442 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384253</link>
      <description>The M.P. for AY 2014-15 was partly allowed, and the M.P. for AY 2015-16 was fully allowed, resulting in the recall of the tribunal order for further examination of specific grounds that were not initially decided. The judgment focused on the non-adjudication of certain grounds in the original and additional grounds of appeal for both assessment years, emphasizing the need for addressing all pressed grounds by the authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>