https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384231 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant, setting aside the demand raised by the Department under Rule 6 of CCR, 2004. Citing precedents like APL Apollo Tubes Ltd., the Tribunal held that waste products arising during the manufacturing process are not subject to the provisions of Rule 6. The decision was based on the understanding that such waste products do not qualify as final goods or exempted goods. The order was pronounced on 06/08/2019. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2019 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384231 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant, setting aside the demand raised by the Department under Rule 6 of CCR, 2004. Citing precedents like APL Apollo Tubes Ltd., the Tribunal held that waste products arising during the manufacturing process are not subject to the provisions of Rule 6. The decision was based on the understanding that such waste products do not qualify as final goods or exempted goods. The order was pronounced on 06/08/2019. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384231