<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1565 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the classification of income items as operating income for Transfer Pricing purposes, the calculation of Arm&#039;s Length Price falling within the permissible range, and the allowability of warranty provisions for the assessment years in question. The appeals of the Revenue and cross objections of the assessee were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings. The order was pronounced on August 24, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 21:17:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1565 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the classification of income items as operating income for Transfer Pricing purposes, the calculation of Arm&#039;s Length Price falling within the permissible range, and the allowability of warranty provisions for the assessment years in question. The appeals of the Revenue and cross objections of the assessee were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings. The order was pronounced on August 24, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>