https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282467 The court declined to interfere with the order-in-original regarding the seizure and confiscation of goods, imposition of penalties, and release of TV sets, citing the availability of an appeal as the appropriate remedy. The petitioner's failure to comply with court directions led to the impugned assessment order. The court emphasized the need for following due process and exhausting legal remedies, dismissing the Writ Petition without costs and granting the petitioner liberty to appeal within 30 days. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2019 21:17:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282467 The court declined to interfere with the order-in-original regarding the seizure and confiscation of goods, imposition of penalties, and release of TV sets, citing the availability of an appeal as the appropriate remedy. The petitioner's failure to comply with court directions led to the impugned assessment order. The court emphasized the need for following due process and exhausting legal remedies, dismissing the Writ Petition without costs and granting the petitioner liberty to appeal within 30 days. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282467