https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282466 The court declined admission of the petition challenging the seizure of goods by the Excise Department, citing prematurity due to ongoing proceedings under the Customs Act, 1962. Emphasizing that a writ petition at the show cause notice stage is premature unless a final adverse order is issued, the court relied on Supreme Court precedent to reject the petition. The court held that the show cause notice stage does not violate party rights, and entertaining the petition prematurely was not appropriate, in line with the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2019 21:17:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282466 The court declined admission of the petition challenging the seizure of goods by the Excise Department, citing prematurity due to ongoing proceedings under the Customs Act, 1962. Emphasizing that a writ petition at the show cause notice stage is premature unless a final adverse order is issued, the court relied on Supreme Court precedent to reject the petition. The court held that the show cause notice stage does not violate party rights, and entertaining the petition prematurely was not appropriate, in line with the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282466