<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19298</link>
    <description>Property brought into a partnership ordinarily becomes partnership property, and distribution of assets on a valid dissolution does not attract registration because no fresh transfer arises on settlement of accounts. However, a so-called partial dissolution is not a recognised dissolution in law: either the firm is dissolved or it continues. Where immovable property is taken out of a continuing firm and placed in the hands of partners as co-owners, the arrangement operates as a transfer of immovable property and, if the statutory threshold is crossed, registration is required under section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act. The deed in question was therefore ineffective without registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19298</link>
      <description>Property brought into a partnership ordinarily becomes partnership property, and distribution of assets on a valid dissolution does not attract registration because no fresh transfer arises on settlement of accounts. However, a so-called partial dissolution is not a recognised dissolution in law: either the firm is dissolved or it continues. Where immovable property is taken out of a continuing firm and placed in the hands of partners as co-owners, the arrangement operates as a transfer of immovable property and, if the statutory threshold is crossed, registration is required under section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act. The deed in question was therefore ineffective without registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>