https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282452 Delay in filing a motor accident claim petition was held sufficiently explained where the claimant had sustained injuries, remained hospitalised and incapacitated, and produced medical records and witness testimony supporting his inability to travel or pursue the claim on time. The Court also accepted that compromise negotiations were ongoing and that the petition was filed soon after they failed, leaving the entire period of delay accounted for under the proviso to Section 110A(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The Tribunal's refusal to condone delay was therefore set aside and the claim petition was directed to be entertained. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2019 17:39:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282452 Delay in filing a motor accident claim petition was held sufficiently explained where the claimant had sustained injuries, remained hospitalised and incapacitated, and produced medical records and witness testimony supporting his inability to travel or pursue the claim on time. The Court also accepted that compromise negotiations were ongoing and that the petition was filed soon after they failed, leaving the entire period of delay accounted for under the proviso to Section 110A(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The Tribunal's refusal to condone delay was therefore set aside and the claim petition was directed to be entertained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282452