<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all three assessment years, deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed merely on the basis of estimated income and that the department failed to provide independent evidence of concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all three assessment years, deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed merely on the basis of estimated income and that the department failed to provide independent evidence of concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>