https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282450 Cross-objections in an appeal arising from writ proceedings were held not maintainable because the statutory CPC device does not ordinarily extend to writ appeals, and the delay in filing them was not condoned for want of sufficient cause. The school-site allotments were also found unlawful because they departed from the governing statutory scheme, lacked pre-determined premium, prescribed procedure, clear terms and a uniform criterion, and reflected arbitrary pick-and-choose selection. Public-interest arguments and subsequent construction could not cure the illegality. The allotments were quashed and fresh disposal of the sites was directed in accordance with the statutory framework. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2019 15:07:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282450 Cross-objections in an appeal arising from writ proceedings were held not maintainable because the statutory CPC device does not ordinarily extend to writ appeals, and the delay in filing them was not condoned for want of sufficient cause. The school-site allotments were also found unlawful because they departed from the governing statutory scheme, lacked pre-determined premium, prescribed procedure, clear terms and a uniform criterion, and reflected arbitrary pick-and-choose selection. Public-interest arguments and subsequent construction could not cure the illegality. The allotments were quashed and fresh disposal of the sites was directed in accordance with the statutory framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282450