<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 396 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384207</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition as premature, advising the petitioner to respond to the show-cause notice and participate in the proceedings. The court emphasized that the assessing officer should proceed according to the law without interference, highlighting the availability of statutory mechanisms for addressing grievances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 396 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384207</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition as premature, advising the petitioner to respond to the show-cause notice and participate in the proceedings. The court emphasized that the assessing officer should proceed according to the law without interference, highlighting the availability of statutory mechanisms for addressing grievances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>