<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 18 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19289</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat ruled in favor of the assessee in a wealth-tax assessment case for the year 1965-66. The court determined that the assessee was entitled to only half of the income from the trust property as per the will and deed of assignment, resulting in only half of the capitalised value of his interest in the immovable properties being liable to wealth-tax. This decision aligned with the Tribunal&#039;s findings, concluding that the assessee owned a moiety in the trust property for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 18 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19289</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat ruled in favor of the assessee in a wealth-tax assessment case for the year 1965-66. The court determined that the assessee was entitled to only half of the income from the trust property as per the will and deed of assignment, resulting in only half of the capitalised value of his interest in the immovable properties being liable to wealth-tax. This decision aligned with the Tribunal&#039;s findings, concluding that the assessee owned a moiety in the trust property for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>