<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit on courier services as it was deemed integral to the manufacturing process. However, the decision to deny CENVAT credit on business auxiliary services was upheld due to insufficient evidence linking the taxed service to manufacturing processes. The Tribunal rejected the plea of limitation concerning the business auxiliary service&#039;s eligibility for CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit on courier services as it was deemed integral to the manufacturing process. However, the decision to deny CENVAT credit on business auxiliary services was upheld due to insufficient evidence linking the taxed service to manufacturing processes. The Tribunal rejected the plea of limitation concerning the business auxiliary service&#039;s eligibility for CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>